<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://emergentink.com/2008/08/17/why/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://emergentink.com/2008/08/17/why/</link>
	<description>greater than the sum of its parts</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 06:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: JumpinGeehossiFat</title>
		<link>http://emergentink.com/2008/08/17/why/comment-page-1/#comment-440</link>
		<dc:creator>JumpinGeehossiFat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 05:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emergentink.com/?p=205#comment-440</guid>
		<description>Paul, thanks for posting this, its excellent and and I had missed it somehow in the CN, and Susan thanks for writing it!

I don't think its possible to take personalities and opinions out of the decision making process and I am not sure I would want to do so. The problem, as you seem to indicate elsewhere in the article, is when the opinion is driven not by the issues but by a desire to "win" for yourself or for your party. If you arrive at an opinion after a review of the issue and your party backs you fine, but it shouldn't be the other way around. Too many people simply take a party line position without examining it. 

I'm about ready for a new party, a party with no "philosophical" baggage, a party that studies an issue and looks for the best solution, and most importantly a party that can change its mind when new facts are uncovered.

Anybody want to party?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul, thanks for posting this, its excellent and and I had missed it somehow in the CN, and Susan thanks for writing it!</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think its possible to take personalities and opinions out of the decision making process and I am not sure I would want to do so. The problem, as you seem to indicate elsewhere in the article, is when the opinion is driven not by the issues but by a desire to &#8220;win&#8221; for yourself or for your party. If you arrive at an opinion after a review of the issue and your party backs you fine, but it shouldn&#8217;t be the other way around. Too many people simply take a party line position without examining it. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m about ready for a new party, a party with no &#8220;philosophical&#8221; baggage, a party that studies an issue and looks for the best solution, and most importantly a party that can change its mind when new facts are uncovered.</p>
<p>Anybody want to party?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
